Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
I mean, it is kinda lame/hilarious that the WWE champion is so far below the US champion that we've gotta say "OF COURSE the WWE champion should lose when facing the US champion. DUH!" But one issue at a time...
A good mullet seems appropriate in this thread right about now.
|
Nobody ever said the WWE champ should lose to the US champ.
But when the US champ happens to be the top babyface in the territory, its fine. If you dont get that, you dont understand the importance of the top babyface in the territory.
Its funny to me because people should be happy that WWE has put a TON of effort in making that US title mean something. That used to a big criticism of the IWC "WWE is shit, the secondary titles dont mean as much as they did 'back in the day'". So now its a really big deal, people still complain.
Ya'll just like to complain.