Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
Ideally, I think my preferred main event at the moment would be for Rollins to hold on to the title 'til WrestleMania, Lesnar to win the Rumble and then Reigns to dupe Sheamus into putting his MITB contract on the line somehow and winning it.
Then Reigns uses the case to announce before-hand that he's making the WrestleMania main event a rematch of last year a Rollins isn't gonna be able to sneak his way to a win this time. Maybe even hold the threat of a random cash-in over Rollins' and the authority's heads in order to get Austin put in as the guest ref/enforcer just so there's no chance of any funny business.
As much as I don't like Rollins as a WrestleMania headliner and think his reign has been shit, I can't really think of a good marquee matchup for the title and at least this one would tell a good story based on last year.
|
It's not bad. I personally think they should be using Brock for Survivor Series and this should be the "true form" of that main event. I agree with you on the general principle though -- the story does work and it might not bomb with Lesnar in there.
My big emotional gripe is that it leaves Ambrose in the dark. I don't know if I'm being too attached, but I just feel that he should have some presence in whatever it is Reigns and Rollins do together, if it is, in fact, together. I guess Ambrose could get more shine elsewhere on the card and could potentially ride it to challenge or turn heel...but eh. I think I'm just on board with Ambrose vs. Rollins vs. Reigns too much.