|
Well, Triple H definitely shouldn't have lost it to any of those guys. Also hb2k, you've pretty much stated in clear writing why Triple H's reign should have gone on so long, and defended him, while trying to argue against his reign. Odd post.
RVD - Nowhere near Triple H's level
Kane - Solid hand, didn't need to win the title
HBK - He did win it, and wasn't that one of the best feuds ever? You know, with Triple H?
Booker T - Not on Triple H's level
Nash - Obvious feud to throw in due to their history. Credible threat, didn't need to win the title at that point in his career.
Goldberg - A legit big name. And Triple H drops the belt to him.
Benoit - Not on Triple H's level, still put him over
Orton - Not ready to be on Triple H's level at that point, still put him over early on in the feud
Batista - Ready for a big push, Triple H put him over.
|