Thread: Rollins STRIPPED of WWE WHC, Out 6-9 months
View Single Post
Old 11-19-2015, 02:05 PM   #309
The CyNick
Make the IWC Great Again
 
The CyNick's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,922
The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
Should I list guys who have jobbed to John Cena as if that's an accomplishment or nah?

Because I feel like it would be really dumb and pointless to start listing guys who have jobbed to John Cena as if JOBBING to John Cena is a rite of passage or something and actually means you're relevant. I feel like BEATING people is a sign that you're relevant as opposed to losing to them (I mean... even I could lose to John Cena... losing to someone is quite easy...) but that could just be me. I haven't been on in a couple days so there could be a ton of posts explaining how losing lots of matches means that beating you is a huge accomplishment so if there are then please disregard this post.
I said Reigns looked strong coming off the program with Wyatt (an accurate statement). Someone said Wyatt is a jobber and everyone looks strong against him (a debatable point at best).

I pointed out his only major losses have been to top guys (Cena, Taker, and Reigns), which doesn't make him any type of jobber. His other programs (Bryan, Ryback, Ambrose, etc) he won. And he's also beaten Reigns and Cena at different times and he just laid out Taker last month.

So to me, by Reigns winning and looking strong, he puts himself in elite company who have beat Wyatt.

Is that factual enough? Or no?
The CyNick is offline   Reply With Quote