Thread: **OFFICIAL** Survivor Series Thread
View Single Post
Old 11-23-2015, 04:56 AM   #39
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,571
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I do not hate Sheamus. The guy is a great worker and is a freak for his size. He's a safe pick for WWE Champion at a time when they don't have too many top stars. I think business was even okay under him in 2009 and 2010 when he was last WWE Champion. This still feels very boring to me though.

I'm trying to trick myself into liking it somehow. Sheamus is better than Reigns, technically. I like it when guys Sheamus' age get the title over a guy that's a few years too young for his prime, like Reigns. He's going to have some fun brawls with Reigns. But I do not give a fuck.

The "wins the title then loses it" shtick doesn't work for him, and it feels like it has marred Reigns to me. If they had gone with Ambrose winning the title, then Sheamus and Barrett jumping him and Reigns walking away as Sheamus cashed in? There's more of a hook coming out of that, Rollins & Ambrose both get WWE Title wins before Reigns, you have matches between Sheamus, Barrett and eventually Reigns on the table for Ambrose. Whatever.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote