Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead
To be a polarizing figure such as Cena isn't a bad thing, and being the company's chosen guy isn't a bad thing and neither of those things are Cena's or Reign's fault. At the end of the day there's no doubting Reigns is a talented guy and with time will grow as a performer. I just think the writing misses the mark and doesn't have their finger on the pulse. That's not to say they can't be successful with this, but something about it really lacks the oomph that makes wrestling awesome.
|
I feel like people throw that pulse thing around. But who determines the pulse? The 15% off the audience that are loud and we're the same people dancing like Fandango the day after Mania? Does that mean WWE would have been smart to go all in on Fandango?
Cesaro is I guess the Internet darling, and Vince at one point did seem to be lukewarm on him. But now you were starting to see them focus on him more. On TV they were awknowledging the Cesaro Section signs to help grow that. Similar to what they did with Bryan and the Yes chants. Is that not an example of listening to the crowd and giving the talent the chance to run with it to see how far they can go?