|
If the question is who is most undeserving I would say Russo or McMahon over Arquette. Only reason being, I can sort of understand why they did what they did (get publicity, its still dumb, but there is some reasoning there). With McMahon and Russo that was just bookers stroking their own egos, for whatever reason I just think thats worse.
But I wouldn't consider any of those guys as "the worst champ ever" because they were never meant to be long term champions, they were just done for ratings or whatever.
So with that in mind I might say Nash, only because he was given such a long run and was well protected before the title win. So he had the best chance, and he failed the most.
|