[#1-norm-fan]

Originally Posted by The CyNick It wasn't a priority. You don't want to have Show lose so quickly after they built up a big match with Lesnar. Again, this whole thing is comical in that it was just an idea I presented as a possibility to give Cesaro something to do. I never once said I heard it would happen. Hell I've never ever claimed I have any inside info on anything. But now that it didn't happen you're using it as some type of slam against me. Comical really.

Originally Posted by Rammsteinmad Pretty sure you made claims like that Cesaro/Big Show feud was "obvious" or whatever. But I'm too lazy to look for it and don't really care.

I got it...

http://www.tpwwforums.com/showpost.p...1&postcount=21

Originally Posted by The CyNick Now here's where most of you guys miss the boat. Cesaro is gaining popularity. Big Show needed someone to heat him up to get ready for Brock. Sure, you could pick another guy to heat up Show, but Cesaro is someone the people care about, and in the long run this will help Cesaro. If you actually watch the fights, you will see Cesaro gets put over in commentary for putting up a fight and trying crazy strength moves against Big Show. But he keeps coming up short. Once Show is done putting over Lesnar strong, I would bet you will see the tide magically change in the ongoing Cesaro-Big Show issue. Instead of Cesaro just going over Show in 5 minutes and quickly heading nowhere back weeks ago when this started, you get multiple weeks of telling a story of Cesaro overcoming the odds. Terrible terrible booking, amirite?

Sounded pretty sure to me. Right down to the "You guys just don't get what they're doing" tone from the first sentence. It wouldn't be as funny if it weren't for the smug "Terrible, terrible booking, amirite?" at the end in regards to something that everyone else knew WWE didn't have the foresight to do and, lo and behold, didn't do. lol