View Single Post
Old 12-14-2015, 11:27 PM   #356
Droford
 
Posts: 52,478
Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Droford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark One View Post
I don't think they can do that again--not to say that they won't, but they shouldn't.

You can't keep stripping the belt from the winner every few months, because you're going to train the crowd to assume that no title victory actually matters because it's going to be undone in 24 hours. They've dug themselves out of that hole after the Fall/Winter prior to WM30, but if they do it again so quickly after the MitB cash-in on Reigns, we're going to end up right back there.

If they want to do something similar they should probably just put Reigns in the Rumble to defend his belt. It's the same end game, but it doesn't have the same effect of cheapening title match victories.
Lol Make Roman defend the belt in the Rumble starting #1. 29 vs 1 handicap match. Thatd probably be the most diabolical thing they could do to Punish him without stripping him of the title.
Droford is offline   Reply With Quote