Quote:
Originally Posted by ron the dial
who has changed their stance on roman? show me a post.
|
No one that I've noticed. He's still just as talented AND has the same flaws he had before. He can't cut a long promo or a scripted promo and make it interesting or compelling to save his life.
The difference is apparently on Sunday and Monday night WWE booked and produced him in a way that was more compelling and worked to his advantage, doing their best to hide Roman's weaknesses and showcase his strengths.
They apparently didn't do what they had been doing, i.e., having him come out and try to memorize and cut an awkward, long winded, horribly written promo that made him come across as a bubble gum, baby face, Cena 2.0. Instead, WWE apparently had him be a bad ass, take no prisoners, wrecking machine who was going to get his point across with violence and destruction.
No one has said Roman isn't a strong hand or doesn't belong in the main event scene at all. The problem is he's not yet proven he's earned that spot necessarily, both in story line and in talent. What had he accomplished as a singles guy in the midcard both in and out of the ring before winning the Rumble? The answer is nothing.
What had HHH, Austin, Rock, HBK, Jericho and others done before winning or getting their first world title shots? Won multiple singles and tag team titles, had great mid card feuds, cut good to great promos and put on great matches and gotten over as heels and/or faces.