Thread: Give me reasons why the Royal Rumble should remain at 30 participants....
View Single Post
Old 12-16-2015, 05:44 AM   #3
DAMN iNATOR
RIP SABU
 
DAMN iNATOR's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,552
DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
We've already seen a 40-Man Royal Rumble, and it really didn't bring any extra sense of excitement or unpredictability to the match. Besides that, if you put 50 or 60 guys into one match, it stands to reason that you'd have to probably find time for them on non-PPV TV, but then by oversaturating the RR match with small name superstars who have little if any future, you defeat said purpose of puttibg them on TV. People would lose interest in the product, ratings would suffer and the company would be in even more dire straits than it already is.
DAMN iNATOR is offline   Reply With Quote