Thread: Give me reasons why the Royal Rumble should remain at 30 participants....
View Single Post
Old 12-16-2015, 03:05 PM   #11
DAMN iNATOR
RIP SABU
 
DAMN iNATOR's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,552
DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by road doggy dogg View Post
Is the WWE even aware that they have 30 active wrestlers on their roster?
I can see where this year with like 5-7 big name guys injured and certain not to be back by the 2016 RR match, it would be quite easy for fans to feel cynical and/or just a general sense of malaise.

I mean, last year, we at least had the all-too-brief illusion that "Hey, Daniel Bryan is the first one to officially enter! No WAY he could possibly NOT win...right?" until the actual match played out, and the end result I'm sure probably makes hardcore fans weary of something similar happening next month.

I'm really, really, REALLY fucking loathe to admit this, but Cena returning and then entering the match, even though he likely won't win if reports of him taking even more time off after the show turn out to be true, it could brighten up an otherwise probably pretty dull match.
DAMN iNATOR is offline   Reply With Quote