Thread: QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire.
View Single Post
Old 01-05-2016, 07:03 AM   #1
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire.
QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire.

From a 'fresh feud' perspective, I think it would hold interest as Jericho vs. Taker has never been done before (my guess is that Jericho likely had nuclear heat with Taker from way back in the day which is why Taker probably refused to work with Y2J, but this likely won't be the case in 2016).

From a wrestling perspective, I think Jericho vs. Taker should be decent. Won't be as good as HBK/Taker, but should be better than HHH/Taker.

What say you?
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote