Thread: QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire.
View Single Post
Old 01-14-2016, 12:02 PM   #22
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
The more times that passes, the more I feel like ending the streak before Taker was done was a Godawful idea.

The streak was an instant WrestleMania draw. It did wonders for Lesnar for a bit but then he lost the title without losing at the peak of his momentum, fucking up the chance to pass the rub to someone else. And on top of that, he ended up just giving Taker his win back and the streak match ended up being just the first in a split series.

And now they would kill to have the allure of Taker's streak match at WrestleMania to make up for the lack of star power that will be there.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote