Thread: QUESTION - Why not Chris Jericho vs. Undertaker at Wrestlemania? Loser must retire.
View Single Post
Old 01-15-2016, 01:02 PM   #27
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignuts HD Edition View Post
They didn't outside of the heat Jericho had with everyone when he first came in. Dunno what Heyman is talkingabout there.
I figured Jericho had some heat with Taker considering they've never worked together despite being a part of the same company for 17 years and counting.

Jericho had heat with everyone when he first arrived, but I wonder if he had even more heat with Taker?

Having said all that, I agree with several other posters in this thread that Cena/Taker would be a greater match-up.......especially if Cena becomes the one to "retire" Taker. Cena and Taker go waaay back to 2002 when Taker first shook Cena's hand after Cena's first match. The storyline and history is definitely there, and Cena would be the perfect guy to retire Taker if the WWE went that route.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote