Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
No. You only look at wins and losses when they work AGAINST Manning. It's the way of the Manning hater.
Manning had the worst season of his career. You'd think that would put the guy who sucks so bad in the playoffs even further behind the guy who's so great in them. They're still neck-and-neck statistically. So if you wanna keep the Manning hate going , you've gotta ignore the stat comparison (or do that thing Droford does where he hypes up the positive Flacco stats and the negative Manning stats instead of just looking at the overall career playoff stats of both guys and calling it a day.)
So then you have to claim wins as the deciding factor. Which is pretty dumb in a team sport to begin with. But it can't be Super Bowl wins now because Manning has the lead in that one. I mean... Jesus Christ. lol
|
Amusing thing is you keep admiting they're neck and neck statistically in The playoffs. Only because Manning had the advantage of playing 8 more yearsbomb the playoffs (10 overall), most of which he was 1 and doning in the playoffs with Colts teams that were supposed to be super bowl contenders.
1998 3-13
1999 13-3 2 seed 1 and done
2000 10-6 6 seed 1 and done
2001 6-10
2002 10-6 5 seed 1 and done
2003 12-4 3 seed lost to NE in AFC Champ (2-1)
2004 12--4 3 seed lost to NE in Div Rd (1-1)
2005 14-2 1 seed 1 and done (started 13-0)
2006 12-4 3 seed won Super Bowl (4-0)
2007 13-3 2 seed 1 and done
The 10 years Peyton had 5 1 and dones including twice as the 2 seed and once as the #1.