View Single Post
Old 03-27-2016, 11:31 PM   #17
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Television is changing, but RAW needs to still remain a viable product for the USA Network to want to keep it. This whole thing about "television ratings across the board are changing" thing is bullshit for the actual networks who want people to be watching. The ratings decreasing might be an expected trend in television, but it's not a desired trend.

I bet you a more exciting product would get people to watch. The live element of the WWE programming lends itself to being able to exist outside the realm of new media, whilst still embracing it in other ways.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote