View Single Post
Old 04-01-2016, 06:13 PM   #44
Ol Dirty Dastard
boop/bop/beep
 
Ol Dirty Dastard's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,453
Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick View Post
I would believe it and understand it. From a branding standpoint, Divas means something to WWE, whereas women is not something you can brand really. So I would get the hesitation. At the end of the day I think it's better to draw female fans with athletic rolemodels than just focusing on looks. Looks should continue to be part of the equation, but not the whole thing. A girl like Aska is not going to get over by being the hottest "Diva", she might get over as an ass kicker.
Ah so no matter what Vince does, he is right. Just what I thought.
Ol Dirty Dastard is offline   Reply With Quote