Thread: DISCUSSION - What should be the "contigency plan" if Roman Reigns FAILS as the Top BabyFace?
View Single Post
Old 04-12-2016, 11:37 AM   #28
Stickman
Stickman
 
Stickman's Avatar
 
Posts: 15,119
Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Stickman has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fragile X View Post
Oh I agree with you. I am just saying that because I was raised on that "attitude" I'm not gonna buy anyone that WWE tell's me "is a good guy". It took me like 8 years to enjoy John Cena, once I found out who he really is, and it just so happens he is a good guy, but that's who he is. Roman, we know nothing about him. He's just another member of the Anoi family tree who used to play football.
I think this is a great point. Not once have I been given a reason to care about Reigns. He has done nothing to entertain me or get me interested in him. His progression has been very different from Cena. We cared about Cena and his Dr of Thuganomics, we cared around his early title reigns, we stopped caring when it seemed like he was dialing it in and he was the industructable super Cena who no sold everything for years. I only started caring for Cena again when CM Punk called out the Cena shenanigans. Now I don't mind the guy. Reigns needs to organically find his way or at the very least improve his ring game beyond 3 moves.
Stickman is offline   Reply With Quote