View Single Post
Old 07-24-2016, 10:43 AM   #477
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCrippyZ View Post
So one of these supposed "equal" brands will be without any world champion? Not that it matters, even if both brands each have their own world title, Raw will still be treated as the premier brand. Always has been, always will be, as long as Vince is in charge. I don't even have a problem with Raw being treated superior in theory, just don't pretend like Smackdown brand and titles are somehow equal to Raw despite the obvious evidence to the contrary.
I think Vince is probably fine with Smackdown being equal now. He was totally justified before. Smackdown was pre-taped, on a lesser channel and much of the time on a worse night. You had to treat Raw as the REAL A show. With Smackdown being live Tuesdays on USA now there's no reason Vince should show preference to Raw. They are equal now.

And I really hope they have floating belts. As much as I do want the brands to not interact, it's WAY better to have one world champ, one tag champ and one divas champ to rule those divisions instead of watering it all down by having one champ who only rules half the company and another who rules the other half. The two world champion era was shit for so many reasons.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote