Thread: Is everyone still mad at the WWE for naming their RAW title as the WWE Universal Championship?
View Single Post
Old 08-16-2016, 11:05 PM   #2
GD
 
Posts: 58,598
GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anybody Thrilla View Post
That wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of what they're doing (like Universal does), but even a title with that name could still have some quality matches behind it.
Kane versus Big Show in an "over the top rope" 60-minute Iron Man "Punjabi Prison" Match with "Hardcore Lumberjacks" surrounding the ring.

On a serious note, I haven't been upset about the name except for when it was announced. Like Hunter said, it's the man who makes the title and not the title that makes the man. In my opinion, the NXT Championship looks hideous and is lower down the pecking order when compared to titles on the main roster. But the way it is booked and the talents that hold it, it comes across as "prestigious". I can see the same happening for the Universal title.
GD is offline   Reply With Quote