Thread: The Trial of The Undertaker
View Single Post
Old 08-24-2016, 02:03 AM   #12
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hb2k View Post
So, for this week's podcast, we're returning to our "Court Case" format to debate the career of the Undertaker on the charge of misrepresentation of stature and level of contribution to WWE's success. We'd like your feedback to the question:

When you examine Undertaker's body of work on and off screen from 1990 to today, did he deserve the career and legacy WWE bestowed upon him, and do you feel he's been as important to WWE's success as they imply?

As always the best contributions will be read on the show during the debate and you'll be credited accordingly. So what do you think, guilty or not guilty, and why?
I think to a large extent, he deserves his legacy. However, I also feel that the reason why Undertaker has "the machine" behind him at full force to hype is legacy, is due to the fact that he helped keep the WWE afloat back when in the early/mid 90's when top stars were defecting to WCW.

Undetaker is deserving of his legacy due to his gimmick, matches, character backstage, etc., but it has been greatly hyped by "the machine" no doubt.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote