View Single Post
Old 07-28-2004, 07:25 PM   #3
Rob
Part time poster
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Posts: 22,963
Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Rob has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Naitch
I saw that last night. I have to agree with Flair on everything, especially on the Bret bashing.
Hmmm I wonder why you'd think that?

*Has a look at your name and just shakes head in disbelief"

FACT - Bret Hart drew money.
FACT - Bret Hart main evented more sucessful PPV's than Ric Flair did. How many PPV's did Ric Flair main event in the WWF again? Oh yeah, NONE!
FACT - Bret Hart wrestled in front of bigger crowds when he was on top of the WWF than Ric Flair did in his peak in both WCW and WWF
FACT - Bret "I can't draw" Hart was given the biggest contract in WWF history in 1996 when he was free to negociate with WCW.
FACT - Vince McMahon went public saying he could not afford Bret Hart and advised him to go to WCW.
FACT - Vince McMahon released Ric Flair back to WCW 4 months after he was the WWF champion because he thought he wasn't good enough for a spot on top of the WWF
FACT - Vince McMahon believed Bret Hart would draw more than Ric Flair would as WWF champion hence why Flair had less than 5 months on top before being release. Bret Hart spent a bit more time on top than that and had 5 title reigns.
If Ric Flair thinks he has the right to judge people's reactions to deaths then he is a fucking tool.

What am I saying? He is one anyway. His comments speak for themselves. And speaking of things that speak for themselves, those facts do.
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote