Thread: QUESTION - Would there be a benefit in ressurrecting "1997 Kane" for Jacob's final year?
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2016, 05:26 PM   #4
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RP View Post
You can do that. Give him a title run. Or just not do it and bring Bautista back for the same effect.
I'm not sure if Batista would be willing to commit for that length of time. On top of that, I think Batista coming in and doing that (after spending the better part of 6 years away from the WWE) would make the rest of the roster look weak.

Kane on the other hand would be able to get away with it, because his character has always been enigmatic. That's the beauty of Kane's character/gimmick. The guy can be a complete upper-card jobber for years on end, and regain his entire credibility back by a simple character tweak/push.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote