Thread: Wrestler of the Year (IYO)
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2016, 08:29 PM   #48
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #BROKEN Hasney View Post
Why though? If wrestling to you is just a good TV show and Matt Hardy was the most entertaining TV segments, why would he not be the best of the year? Who gives a shit if it was done in the ring? My secondary choice would be the Worldwide Underground in Lucha Underground which probably had a more "traditional" wrasslin' presence.

If someone asked me to pick the best TV to watch that involves wrestling, it would be the Hardys arc
It's the same reason the WWE won't win an Emmy for Best Drama. It's just not good enough. If wrestling is a good TV show to you, then it still needs to be pass good criteria. You may have loved The Hardys stuff subjectively, but objectively I think you would have to admit that it's just not that "end of year awards" worthy. A cult film doesn't take the Oscar. You may have enjoyed it more, but you can't make a case for that being widespread popular opinion.

And before you cite others on this board, keep in mind that less than 400,000 people actually watch Impact Wrestling.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote