Thread: Rules Inconsistant?
View Single Post
Old 07-30-2004, 11:21 PM   #8
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alienoid06
I think it is probably something along the lines of the announce table, ring steps, barricade, etc. are all part of the ring/arena, so throwing them into the ring is just like slamming them into the mat. Weapons introduced from under the ring, tights, etc. or that have been banned previously are illegal, thus a DQ. I think introducing a weapon would be considered "illegal" (which explains Michael Cole's spasms), but using it indirectly (Van Daminator, DDT, etc.) is legal. I would assume bring a chair in to DDT your opponent on is illegal, but DDTing them when it has been brought in by the opposing party it is legal.
Even in that, they're not consistent. Let's face it, kids. The WWE is not in the business of continuity. These are some of the SMALLER complaints one could have in the grand scheme of things. They're in the business of telling a soap opera,.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote