Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KingofOldSchool
Why?
Because I don't have my head up Bret Hart's ass like most of you do and have actually watched enough of Ric Flair's stuff over the years to realize that Flair is better than Bret?
Why?
Because I've actually stayed true to my favorite wrestler of all time and not turn on him just because he says stuff about Bret Hart that made idiots like you get their Huggies in a bunch?
Why?
Because I'm not a 14 year old ignorant loser who has never gotten the chance to actually watch a lot of Flair stuff from the time where he was actually used correctly? Or is it because I'm not someone who's only source of wrestling was the WWF therefor making biased opinions about Flair left and right just because of it?
|
If you watch Flair as much as you claim to, you would know that Bret hit the nail on the head when he said that all Flair's matches are the same routine. I know myself, because i've watched wrestling for over twenty years, so i've seen my share of Flair matches. It was the same routine against every opponent. About the only thing Flair was good at was cutting a good promo. There is a misconceived perseption that because Flair was a 16-time champ that he was a legendary wrestler. If Goldberg or Kevin Nash were 16-time champs would that make them legendary too?