|
I find it funny looking back at Cena vs Brock. A lot of comments, including my own, about how Brock is a superior wrestler, but that Cena has more of the intangibles and a bigger presence outside of actually wrestling (which is rather debatable imo). Regardless, it seems like it came down to who had the bigger impact on wrestling, not who was the better wrestler. Yet here we are, faced with a similar dilemma, and all of a sudden it seems like it is all about the wrestling. Strange.
I voted for Vince because he has had a far greater impact on the business than Cena. Is Cena a better wrestler? Clearly, by leagues. But who has been more important to the industry as a whole? Vince. No contest. If Vince never existed it would have a huge impact on where we are today with the wrestling world; if Cena never existed? Well, meh?
|