Thread: REHASHING AN OLD ARGUMENT: Who would you rather have on your roster right now?
View Single Post
Old 09-24-2017, 09:08 PM   #110
Ol Dirty Dastard
boop/bop/beep
 
Ol Dirty Dastard's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,430
Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
Lol, the letter grading is semantics. In the US it is a low letter grading, but that's because they don't space them out evenly and call everything below a fail simply a fail. Other parts of the world space things out more evenly and you don't get a "D" grade until you fail. You can basically separate them in blocks of 20%: A, B, C, D (fail), E or F (really bad fucking fail). 0-20 is really fucking bad, 20-40 is bad, 40-60 is average and barely a pass, 60-80 is good, and 80-100 is excellent. 75% is 75% anywhere regardless of if you call it a B or a C or an ostrich.

Many academic institutions call anything over 85% a high distinction. Doesn't make it any better or worse than calling 85% shitting the bed or whatever you want to call it.
Given the subject matter of the actual argument, this is a fucking amazing post
Ol Dirty Dastard is offline   Reply With Quote