View Single Post
Old 10-13-2017, 06:11 PM   #37193
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,436
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Of course Jimmy Jacobs got fired for what he did. The WWE has been benevolent enough to allow two guys outside the company to se their licences and trademarks to get themselves over. Then, these same two dickheads, parody the big company that kind enough to let them use the shit. Then they go into the backyard of the company and do it. Then a dude who took a photo supporting this gets fired.

WWE has sucked lately. Now people get sad when one of the culprits is fired? The "Festival of Friendship" (if Jacobs did come up with it) was not good because of Jimmy Jacobs. Chris Jericho carried that entire segment with an outrageous performance. Jericho's current gimmick? Saying stuff again and again until it is over because it is Jericho? This is like Russo taking credit for Stone Cold Steve Austin, but on a much smaller scale.

I've got nothing against Jimmy Jacobs. I heard some of his ROH stuff was good. But this sook party for a dude being fired for putting something on social media that makes the statement he would rather be other places is asinine. And if Jacobs mattered he wouldn't have been fired. This isn't Heyman getting demoted because he made RAW look bad. Jacobs is redunant.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote