Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vastardikai
Hate to interject myself into this interesting conversation, but I have an example of something from the past to use as an example to back up CyNick:
If memory serves, the NWA World Heavyweight Champion was a travelling Champion. Every region had their own personal Regional Champion and was their Main Eventer. They also built up guys who were deemed as a legitimate challenge to NWA World Heavyweight Champion, and he would face that person. There was prestige in being the World Heavyweight Champion, and the region he came from definitely got a rub from that person being the champion (we're the best region, as the champion is from here, etc etc.).
I think it would be quite possible that WWE could do that with one Champion, and have the US and Intercontinental Championships be the Brand Specific secondary Titles.
|
Well this is a public forum, so if you have something to add, feel free. You give a good example, and I am not arguing the fact that being the Champion of the WWE is more prestigious than just being the champion of RAW or Smackdown. But I personally am just not in favor of having one champion that goes back and forth between two shows. I think that if the rosters are seperated, then they should actually remain
seperate . The more I think of it, I really am in favor of my idea to have a champion that is similar to what the SuperBowl champion is for the NFL. Have a tournament or something to set up the main event for Wrestlemania where it might not even be between the two current champions and won't even be for the world title necessarliy. But the winner has bragging rights of being called the best in the WWE for an entire year. I dunno, I haven't actually thought that idea out all the way through, but you get the basic idea?