Thread: DISCUSSION - Smackdown should become the modern day "Sunday Night Heat"
View Single Post
Old 08-08-2004, 04:52 PM   #14
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick
Which I agreed with.

But, what Heyman was saying is to make SD like a minor league group, which would be suicide.
I'm not quite saying that.

1) I still proposed that the 'main-event angle' still be carried over to Smackdown (i.e. so if Trips/Benoit are feuding on Raw over the World [one] title), then it could carry over to SD as well (15 minutes of alloted time).


Also - with only a 3rd (less?) of the wrestlers on Raw (all of which would be main-eventers), it's not like Smackdown would be the "minor leagues" or anything. For example - If Raw only had 14 wrestlers (the ones I listed in my original post), then SD would still have Batista, Flair, Kane, Matt Hardy, RVD, Christian, Booker T, etc.


p.s. If more people watch UPN Smackdown, then why not do the INVERSE of what I said? (i.e. put the top main-eventers on Smackdown, make SMACKDOWN be "the place to be", and make Smackdown the 'live' show).
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote