Quote:
Originally Posted by Destor
Not sure how they get to mania without doing strowman v lesnar
|
It's the WWE, that's how.
I have this sinking feeling they may try to force another triple threat by adding Strowman to Lesnar v Reigns. Unfortunately. I see the WWE logic being along the lines of "Strowman being in this match will make the crowd happier!" Even though Roman winning will crush all of that and probably make it much much worse. And after that stinker of a triple threat last night I am not at all enthused about the prospect of another one.
What would they even do with Lesnar v Strowman at EC? Strowman going over would be the only possible way to make that go over well because Lesnar winning would be yet another blow to their most popular main event act atm and pointless in the grand scheme of things. And do you really put Strowman over Lesnar to then job him to Reigns? That's a short term fix to the larger issue and that isn't going to go over well; that's going to get more boos than Reigns over Lesnar will by a long shot. The only way they could get maximum joy from the fan base is to put Strowman over Lesnar and then over Reigns; and the likelihood of that happening is almost absolute zero. No way the WWE will strike while the iron is hot.