Thread: Are you sick of Stephanie McMahon taking the credit for the women's revolution?
View Single Post
Old 01-30-2018, 08:10 PM   #38
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAMN iNATOR View Post
I'm sorry but this post is just absurd.
I don't really see how, unless you are taking "women don't deserve equal pay." I think what Destor's saying is that Brock Lesnar and John Cena are much more crucial to WWE's merchandise, attendance, television ratings and Network subscriptions than Bayley is. I don't think that's an absurd point at all. My point is just that this isn't the narrative they're pushing. They're legit trying to present the Women's Championships as World Championships, letting them headline the Royal Rumble, etc. It wouldn't surprise me if they do the same thing at Elimination Chamber or if whatever Ronda Rousey does at Mania goes on higher than whatever AJ Styles and Nakamura are doing. Given what they left in Japan, I doubt that Styles or Nakamura is getting paid less than $400,000 a year.

But this is common in entertainment. No one at the top wants to take a cut, but it's too exhaustive to pay women as much as men in that sort of work.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote