Thread: WrestleMania 34 - OFFICIAL hype and discussion thread
View Single Post
Old 04-09-2018, 11:41 PM   #1882
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,618
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
This is literally the exact reason Vince Russo used for why the Arquette thing was good.

It got attention. Great PR/marketing-wise. That one PR move isn't as valuable as building credibility for a title that can be used to draw on a consistent basis. Choosing shock value/easy publicity over the value of the titles are a big reason they can't use titles as a draw anymore.
They have all these belts because Vince (McMahon) has this thing where he can't imagine running a show without championship matches, but when was the last time a match actually drew because a belt was on the line? It's really idiosyncratic.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote