View Single Post
Old 04-27-2018, 04:10 PM   #1
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
Lol, I don't think anyone thinks they could have put women on the show. Like, they literally couldn't. But doing business with them at all is questionable, morally, if you are going to claim to be a company with morals.
I'm not arguing the morality of going there at all. RP saying "Tell me why its ok for WWE to spout womens revolution bullshit and then go to Saudi and not have women on the show at all." definitely makes it sound like he thinks WWE could have made a statement by going there and booking women and chose not to though. lol
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote