Thread: Shakeups and Dual Branded PPVs
View Single Post
Old 05-04-2018, 11:23 AM   #6
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,815
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
I just don't get the roster split. I think it's an incredibly daft idea that boxes them into things they don't need to box themselves into. You want to make SmackDown unique? Feature guys that you aren't using on Raw. You don't need to use everybody on every show. And when they do the drafts, it's just moving a lot of people from stale positions into a stale mix. They're just kicking up the dirt; it doesn't mean anything.
That is such a good point. I think the best way they ever did it was in 2005 where 1 person went to a new show each week for 5 weeks. That led to some truly impactful moves, Cena and Angle to Raw and Batista to Smackdown are all segments I can remember fondly still 13 years later.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote