Thread: Did Bret Hart do anything important other than The Montreal Screwjob?
View Single Post
Old 05-16-2018, 09:02 PM   #2
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
I've got this disagree with this. Punk could promo and I enjoyed a lot of his work, but retroactively there is no way Punk was overall better. I'd take Hart any day of the week. Punk's got one slight buyrate increase to his name. We've already discussed Wembley.
I said he was a better overall performer. If you wanna use houses where they headlined as the be all end all, you're putting yourself in the position of having to rationalize how Bret was better than a lot of guys I'm sure you think he's actually better than. Like Roman Reigns.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote