View Single Post
Old 07-18-2018, 06:04 PM   #110
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
If I were crafting an actual argument for a debate, then I would possibly consider choosing my words to be more courteous to the feelings of the people they are targeted at in order to appeal to their sense of security in order to bring them with me. But I'm not crafting an argument for the purposes of a structured debate, and it's fallacious to assume that is what someone is always doing, and is what someone always ought to be doing. Seeing how it makes people emotionally perceive them is perfectly valid, and a tool that could be used for self-reflection, as opposed to simply trying to remove it from the party and reduce things to a censored and gentrified level of discourse that euphemistically discuss the contemporary urgency of the issues at hand.

Thanks for the challenge though. Fun times.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote