Thread: Enough Already...The truth of the World Heavyweight Title
View Single Post
Old 08-11-2004, 05:01 PM   #7
The One
Boss
 
The One's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,611
The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)The One has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
I would agree, but a company has the right to split the title if they so desire...and if you take your logic to it (not that I am bashing you) but then the RAW World Title would have the WWE IC, WCW US, WWE European, and the WWE Hardcore title as it's liniage...I like to think of title unifications as saying "This guy currently holds the most important of the fallowing titles" but the company reserves the right to withdraw the titles at any point...hence the US Title Booker T holds is the same won that was in WCW...My guess as to why the SmackDown Titles have never once tried to been linked to the WCW Tag Titles is becuase the WCW Tag division was shit from about 1993 onward.

Also then by your logic, the only title in the WWE that has a history beyond 2002 is the WWE Title WWE Women's and the World Tag Titles...making the World, IC, US, WWE Tag, and Cruiserweight title basically baby titles.

The fact is the company owns the title, and therefore can do whatever they want with it...they could by definition, award George Bush and Osama Binladin the Cruiserweight Tag Champions and promot a Title defense against Satna Cluas and the Easter Bunny for SummerSlam...just so long as they had a "Card Subject to Chage" at the bottom...
The One is offline   Reply With Quote