Thread: What WWE should do with Becky Lynch at Royal Rumble
View Single Post
Old 11-20-2018, 06:40 PM   #14
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
The women aren't very good at that match. They shouldn't just give them gimmicks to emulate the men. They should come from their own styles and strengths. Give them something similar to a G1 or something. They all fight each other all the time anyway. Raw block winner faces SmackDown winner. Really, these two winners could be the #1 Contenders on their own show.

But having two Royal Rumbles also makes the Royal Rumble a bit muted. It should be the story of the show, where your anticipation builds through the whole night to get to it. You can't do that with two Rumbles.

Look, if they really want to do one, and pad it out with legends and NXT girls, fine, I get it -- do it sometime later in the year to set up Evolution. Give them another PPV around SummerSlam time so that SummerSlam can focus on the main issues while the women can focus on having a Royal Rumble and maybe two title matches and one grudge match.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote