Thread: What WWE should do with Becky Lynch at Royal Rumble
View Single Post
Old 11-21-2018, 02:08 AM   #2
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,569
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignuts View Post
I can stand to watch some of these women in small doses, which is basically what we get now. A G-1 is not small daoses. It's 10-30 minute matches for every round.

I mean you could shorten it to 5-15 minute matches, but at that point it's like, who cares?

It just doesn't seem feasible in the WWE enviornment.
I'm not sure I follow your logic of them being 10-30 minute matches. I mean, who cares now? I mean, I can understand being skeptical of them being able to book it sensibly and know where they are going and not fuck things up with their own scoring, but the length of the matches has got nothing to really do with a round robin tournament.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote