Lance Armstrong isn't a drug cheat, there is no solid evidence AT ALL. You just overlooked everything I said in the other thread. Lance Armstrong isn't the best time trialist in the world, he is one of the best in the Tour de France, theres a difference. It is not unheard of to be good in both of those areas in the Tour, and my evidence was Jan Ullrich. You act like you know for a fact that Lance Armstrong is doping when really you have no clue other than what the media is telling you, and the media that is telling you information is the same one printing books with non-factual information against him. You can think what you want, but Lance Armstrong has never been caught on even the smallest doping charge, so until he is your opinion really doesn't mean anything.
Quote:
|
I actually watched quite a bit of ESPN when i was in North America and I noted the lack of criticism of Armstrongs conduct. I notice that you have been silent on the maater as well.
|
Cycling isn't big in the United States, for four weeks in the summer ESPN will give an update on the race and thats about it. I have been silent on the matter? Did you even read my post? ESPN isn't where I got my coverage of the Tour and its not where I get my information on Lance. And what do you want them to be criticizing anyway? "Even though nobody is paying attention, Lance chased down a guy who tried to nark on him with no proof of anything."
Quote:
|
The very fact that you were not aware of the Portuguese team nor the discussion concerning the release of players for the tournament simply shows your ignorance.
|
I am at a loss for words as to how rediculous this is. You are calling me ignorant for not knowing that the Portuguese national team is using some of its top players. If I knew everything about every sport in the whole damned world do you think I would be sitting here talking to you? I guess your logic makes this whole place a pretty ignorant group.