|
And you have a hardon for being the higher-than-thou know-it-all, belittling people for the sake of "argument". If you have a problem with me, take it to PMs. Don't be an ass, just because you have a bunch of green squares under your name due to a lot of other posters licking your ass at every given moment.
For the record, I did know the facts of the other WWE case, and my opinion still stands. I never pointed out WWE as the innocent victim, and if you bothered to pay attention, my problem with the outcome of the case was not that WWE had to change their name, or them even losing the case altogether, but the blurring of logos, blanking out of the old name as if it never existed in the years 1998-2002. If you would get off your own genitals for one moment, and stop worrying about other people's opinions so much for the sake of your own ego, maybe some of those little "green squares" under your name would be worthwhile.
I admit, I didn't know those pieces of information until I had read this thread, as the information given in the article in the first post did not state either of those two items. I do now, and while I figured WWE was up to their usual tricks, it's still anal. If you have a problem with that opinion, or the person behind it, PM that person and be done with it.
|