Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Supermark101
Dammit :foc: as much as I hate to admitt it wrestling is entertainment. For me though, I want to watch a match that makes me not even think about changing the channel. Many of Hart's matches, not just with Luger, made me want to change the channel.
What made Ric Flair great was he could have a classic match with any peice of crap. Bret Hart was not a bad wrestle. He just did not have the talent to make others look better than they were.
|
What? Bret is well known for making shit wrestlers have their best matches. He carried guys like diesel and taker and other lesser talents to some pretty damn good matches.
Also Bret in the ring was a solid storyteller, much better then flair, thus meaning his matches usually ended up more entertaining. Only thing flair did that you think would be entertaining is flip floppoing around selling exageratedly and everything else.
Bret made others look good through realism, Flair needed to exagerate to do this.
Bret is the man. You can like flair better but you gotta get the facts down right.