Thread: "100,001" Replies (Wrestling Forum)
View Single Post
Old 06-01-2019, 06:42 PM   #50383
GD
 
Posts: 58,598
GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat View Post
Think the idea was them wanting to break off from the older eras and establish the newer belts from the brand split era as the de facto titles going forward. That also meant ignoring all the old history attached to the belts with the exception of the IC and WWE belt.

Its also why the current RAW tag belts only trace back to 2002 since that was the original Smackdown tag belts when it became the de facto WWE tag belt prior to the 2nd brand split era.
That's why it is incorrect for them to suggest that The New Day are the first RAW Tag Team Champions.

Also, they even chose the Divas Championship's lineage over the original WWE Women's Championship when the titles were unified.
GD is offline   Reply With Quote