Thread: Wrestling Clichés
View Single Post
Old 06-14-2019, 10:06 PM   #90
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,978
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
WWE treats its belts like props in the derogatory sense. That's not really debatable. Talking about how Charlotte getting the SD Women's Title is just a thing that is going to happen and not to think about it too much? That's just "lolWWE" stuff.'

That being said, the whole "prop" thing is a frustrating thing to me, just because "prop" doesn't necessarily need to be a bad word. The belts are props on their best days, but they can be props that mean something and are useful to telling the story. They can be more than a MacGuffin or set dressing. But that's just a semantics issue.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote