View Single Post
Old 09-16-2019, 09:13 PM   #5
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,565
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guru Dave View Post
The same logic applies where the potential winner was already being pushed or primed for success.
Yeah, but the tournament itself helps them. I think there’s been one guy that has won at the Dome because of it. And I might be wrong, but I think there have been times where the tournament itself is the push. I’m thinking Naito and Omega, but I might be wrong.

Comparatively, the King of the Ring is more an anchor. You can be getting a push and then the tournament ruins it. The guy I will say it helped is Booker T. The King Booker gimmick may have mixed critical response, but it did put Booker in the SmackDown main events.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote