TPWW Forums - View Single Post - Should Kidman and London have a team name?

**Loose Cannon** · 08-21-2004, 05:27 PM

YES, for god sakes YES. This is the WWE's problems with tag teams these days. Nobody gets names. It's just werstler x and wrestler x. Nobody is made to look like a team anymore.

This is the one reason why I LOVE La Resistance. They have a Team Name, Similar Robes they wear to the ring and a Team Finisher.

Now, they seem to be doing this with Kidman/London. They now have matching entrance attire and theme music. They are trying to be booked as the Rockers, which is how they should be booked. Funny thing in the Observer, they mentioned that they looked more like the Young Stallions. haha.

But yeah, they definately need a team name. I like the "Shooting Stars" Name that Cynick mentined.

08-21-2004, 05:27 PM	#17
Loose Cannon I'm all there is Posts: 31,811	YES, for god sakes YES. This is the WWE's problems with tag teams these days. Nobody gets names. It's just werstler x and wrestler x. Nobody is made to look like a team anymore. This is the one reason why I LOVE La Resistance. They have a Team Name, Similar Robes they wear to the ring and a Team Finisher. Now, they seem to be doing this with Kidman/London. They now have matching entrance attire and theme music. They are trying to be booked as the Rockers, which is how they should be booked. Funny thing in the Observer, they mentioned that they looked more like the Young Stallions. haha. But yeah, they definately need a team name. I like the "Shooting Stars" Name that Cynick mentined.