View Single Post
Old 07-09-2020, 10:51 AM   #37
Ol Dirty Dastard
boop/bop/beep
 
Ol Dirty Dastard's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,453
Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I don't necessarily want this to be a "dump on commentary thread."

Maybe we can look at the commentary from a different light. Do we think Vince cares about the commentators telling a story as much as he cares about the buzzwords? Again, it all sounds integral to the branding and shit that sponsors like.

With the current state of WWE with its shareholders, board members, advertisers, and television deals, do they want the television to speak with its given nomenclature?

Or is this just an example of "Vince being Vince?"

I don't know why, but I could see shareholders and advertisers loving shit like "WWE Universe" and "Superstars." Or how they HAVE to call wrestlers by their fucking nicknames that rarely make any sense.
Ol Dirty Dastard is offline   Reply With Quote